| || |
No, it's not a radio station. It is, however, a law firm with a great home page: elegant graphics, simple layout, good use of white space. Our expectations were set high after seeing the home page. Inside, however, we were disappointed. The home page uses old server-side imagemap technology. The ˝what═s newţ section contains documents related to various high-tech lawsuits, but the presentation leaves many questions unanswered. Are these cases in which the firm is involved? How new is new? (The ˝what═s newţ page lack dates.) And why is info published in browser-hostile PDF format? The ˝attorney profilesţ subpage includes an 18 K A-Z listing of the firm═s many attorneys - also not a user-friendly presentation. A few 1996 newsletters were online, but they could stand to be broken up into smaller Web-friendly chunks. There is a search engine, but its interface is clunky. There is some good substantive content buried under ˝legal resourcesţ (and then by legal topic), but these were not cross-linked from ˝WSGR Publicationsţ (where we═d expect to find them), and many were undated. If the information on this site were rearranged, there might be some reason to come back. For now, there is not.